Other
transcripts
Transcripts
September 11, 2003
Host:
Michael Grant
Topics:
·Arizona's Homeland Security Department
·Ballet Arizona
In-Studio Guests:
·Frank Navarrete, director of the Arizona homeland
security office;
·Ib Andersen, director of Ballet Arizona
>> Michael: Tonight on "Horizon," it is the second
anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Are we safer? We'll
talk about efforts to make us safer in the air and on the ground.
And ballet Arizona will soon be opening its new season. We'll
tell you about that and how the company is doing financially.
Good evening, I'm Michael Grant. It was a horrible sight two years
you a, the jets flying into the World Trade Center towers and
their eventual collapse, but are we safer now? That is a question
we will ask our Arizona homeland security director. First, producer
Mike Sauceda tells us more about efforts to make us safer when
we fly.
>> Reporter: Buster the explosive sniffing dog is searching
for an odor cone. When he passes through one that contains threat
levels of explosives he will react.
>>Rick Ramos: It's all odor recognition that we've trained
him to recognize odor and to respond and he responds in what we
call a passive response as opposed to drug dogs who do aggressive
response waseer dealing with explosives. His passive response
would be to sit down at the source and he will not leave until
he gets his reward.
>> Reporter: Buster, part labrador is one of three dogs
who constantly patrol the airport searching for explosives. He
says buster is a transportation security administration dog and
will soon be joined by three others.
>>Rick: Right now we have another canine in school. He
will be graduating October 10th, which will bring us up to four
dogs. The TSA canine program will pay up to six dogs for major
airports, and we're planning by March of next year to have two
more canines and be up to six canines like all the other major
airports across the country.
>> Reporter: Besides more explosive sniffing dogs there
have been many changes at airports since terrorist boarded four
planes two years ago with box cutters and smashed two jets into
the World Trade Center towers. One of the basic has been the formation
of the TSA itself. Paul Armes is director for the TSA. He says
another big change has been security screeners who have been federalized
since 9/11.
>>Paul Armes: Before 9/11 we did not have the level of
training of today. All of those regulatory requirements that have
been enacted by the patriot act or caused by the patriot act in
some respects have given us opportunity to build a first-class,
world-class operation. We think from a customer service standpoint
and a security standpoint.
>> Reporter: Robert Brown is deputy director for airport
operations at Sky Harbor. The TSA, the aport and carriers all
share responsibility for security. He says there have been change
on the airport's end as well.
>>Robert Brown: Let's talk about some of the changes that
have occurred now that we can talk about. Obviously I can't tell
you about any specific things we're doing in our airport security
program, but you will see a lot more presence of uniformed enforcement
folks out at the airport. That's through the help of the Phoenix
Police Department. That's through the help of our own airport
operations security staff that's here 24/7. We strongly believe
on visibility for a deterrence factor, and we're applying that.
The public should see that, that we do have this type of a component
here at the airport, and we have deployed some of the staff in
that regard. So that's something you'll see right off the bat.
>> Reporter: Before 9/11, those without tickets could go
behind security checkpoints to greet those arriving. That's what
practice that is no longer allowed. Improvements have been made
to the technology used for checking baggage and people. Cockpit
doors have been strengthened on planes. Pilots are being allowed
to carry guns and the number of air marshals has been dramatically
increased and and, of course, now you might have to take off your
shoes. That's not mandatory, but TR Johnson says doing so will
save you the Haas you will of a secondary screening.
>>TR Johnson: It's not a requirement. We recommend you
take off your shoes to speed up the process. We find most people
have metal in their shoes they are not aware of and if you take
it off on this side of the checkpoint it speeds the process up
so much faster.
>> Reporter: Checked baggage is being looked at more closely.
Don Beardsley, another security screener says there are several
items you don't want to put in checked baggage.
>>Don Beardsley: There is a certain 16 to 20 ounce cans
of hairspray can't go in --
>>Reporter: Because it's flammable.
>>Don: Any type of bleach, fireworks, anything like that.
Firearms are permitted as long as they're checked in at the desk
for the particular airline they're flying. Jellies they sell here,
peanut butter, food items shoes will be a subject item. A lot
of books. Glassware, mirrors, anything like that that will --
it will just project on the screen it is a prohibited item and
we actually have to physically go in and look in the bag and make
sure what it is.
>>Reporter: Why peanut butter?
>>Don: The density. You can imagine a jar of peanut butter
how dense it looks. Obviously you can't see it through but the
density of the item.
>> Reporter: Have all these changes made flying safer from
a potential terrorist attack?
>>Paul: Absolutely. Any number of reasons why, but much
safer today than it was pre-9/11.
>> Reporter: However, weapons are still slipping through.
>>Paul: And that's something that's regrettable but we're
finding several hundred a month, and in many cases there's always
one of these, I didn't know it was in there, and we're trying
to make people aware of that, divest up front, and we're still
finding too many things, though, and again it's just a general
awareness thing, I think for the public.
>> Reporter: Security screener Theresa Burns has personally
found some.
>>Theresa Burns: One day running the x-ray machine and
a meat cleaver and a butcher knife came through the x-ray machine.
It was pulled aside. A police officer was called.
>> Reporter: One area still in need of improvement is the
screening of cargo which can be carried on cargo and passenger
jets. The problem was highlighted when a man shipped himself in
a crate from New York to Texas as cargo.
>>Paul: We do have a process for that. It's not as extensive
as it perhaps -- some think it could be but we do have a process
for checking cargo. In this particular case, for some reason,
that system failed.
>> Reporter: There is an effort to further improve passenger
screening. It's called caps II, the computer assist touchdown
pre-screening II program. Passengers would have color coded information
to indicate a level of threat posed by passengers. The risk is
based on a variety every factors. Armes says it's still under
development.
>>Paul: The program is to try to make it transparent to
the general public as to who is being identified as perhaps a
risk, and that whole process is being developed through a lot
of different legal requirements. Obviously there's a lot of concern
about. But there's also a lot of concern about the continued threat
out there. So as this threat is assessed and we're able to build
these databases that may be helpful in preventing the risk that
we foresee, we hope we'll have the opportunity to exercise some
of that.
>> Reporter: Brown says the airport itself is working time
prove its security over the next few years.
>>Robert: What will we see in the future? This airport
is developing a security master plan for the facility. That includes
also the general aviation airports that we have, Goodyear and
Deer Valley airport within the Phoenix airport system. And we've
hired a consulting group to come in and help us analyze our vulnerabilities
at this facility and to help us develop an action plan of how
to enhance those and eliminate and minimize those vulnerabilities
and put together an action plan for the next five to seven years
in order for us to be a lot stronger, if you will, from a security
side on this airport.
>> Reporter: In the meantime, buster will be on duty making
sure the airport is free from explosives and flies.
>> Michael: Earlier this evening I talked to Frank Navarrete.
He is the director of the Arizona homeland security office. Here
is that interview. Frank, two years later, is air travel safer?
>>Frank Naverrete: I think it is safer. No doubt in my
mind. And I don't feel a bit apprehensive about flying. As a matter
of fact, I'm flying tonight on the anniversary, if you will. So
it is. And a lot of it is obvious. The things you see with screeners,
the TSA screeners and so forth. And a lot of it is behind scenes
that the average person doesn't see. On the other hand, there
are some vulnerabilities. As demonstrated by the gentleman that
shipped himself across the nation last week --
>> Michael: That was bizarre.
>>Frank: I mean, that kind of points out a vulnerability.
Are we there yet? No. Have we made a lot inroads? Yeah. The hijack
Inc.ing, I think an actual hijacking would be a tough thing to
pull off. Now, we've got these other things we have to deal with
such as the cargo planes and that sort of thing.
>> Michael: Do we sometimes go too far? Are we starting
to color code people, are we giving up too much freedom for some
security?
>>Frank: Well, I think we're going to have to have a tradeoff.
I do. I don't want to speak to that particular program itself
but there are going to be trade- offs that have to be made. We
have to look at other countries that have gone through this. I
think we're going to reach a point where we're going -- we will
as a nation accept a certain level of threat and say, okay, we
have to live with this because we can't eliminate 100% of threat.
And once we get to that point, I'm sure that we're going to probably
give up some potential liberties that we took for granted and
we used to take life for granted. We're not doing that anymore.
We're giving that one. How about the -- excuse me -- the invasion
at the airports, i.e, I'm sorry, sir, you have to take off your
shoes. Is that a liberty? Yeah, I would like to wear my shoes
through the airport. It's a minor form of losing liberties but
I suspect we will have to do some.
>> Michael: Disturbing report out of the FBI about the
ability to get driver's licenses in Arizona and not necessarily
be yourself. You figured that one out yet?
>>Frank: First of all, I'm not sure that you can -- well,
you're talking about just the driver's license program with fake
I.D.
>> Michael: That's right.
>>Frank: Have I figured it out? No, but I know that the
department of motor vehicles is taking a very hard look at and
that trying to come up with -- and they have come one some programs
to try to minimize that, if not eliminate it. Again, I mean, I
could probably walk out here on a campus and if I had the right
connections, buy a set of I.D.s tonight that looks pretty darn
good. So, you know, how do we put -- how do we put plans and processes
in place to prevent people from doing that, if you will, with
fake I.D.s?
>> Michael: It seemed like we were making strides in that
area. I mean, I know for example the driver's licenses recently
-- at least from their face, seem to be, you know, much more secure.
You've got the signature on there, those kinds of things. Is it
just that there is nothing that can't be cracked?
>>Frank: Well, I think -- any improvement presents a challenge
to people. I mean, you have software challenges that people --
I mean, you harden your software situation and pretty soon some
kid 18 years old coming out of college thinks, thanks, good challenge.
Same thing with driver's licenses or any other form of I.D. I
think our driver's licenses the way they're constructed and presented
I think are pretty safe in the sense of altering them. The issue
at this point in time is the I.D. associated with applying for
the license.
>> Michael: Right. Was it your comment that I heard shortly
after that story broke that said we need to standardize the kind
of I.D. from state to state that you use to get the driver's license,
or was it someone else?
>>Frank: No, I wish I could take credit for that one, but
it's true. I think because it's very easy -- I can get a driver's
license here under false pretenses, go to Virginia, turn my driver's
license in there as I.D., which they'll confiscate and get a Frank
Navarrete driver's license which I may have appropriated with
false I.D.
>> Michael: What do I have to show here to get a driver's
license?
>>Frank: I don't know.
>> Michael: I don't either.
>>Frank: I just came here. When I came here, I had to show
my Arizona driver's license and they took it and I knew they were
going to take it and that was my I.D.
>> Michael: Obviously you and I originally applied for
our driver's license a long time ago but we don't need to get
into that.
>>Frank: Thanks.
>> Michael: Listen, when I talked to your predecessor,
Chuck Blanchard, early on, I know one of the concerns that he
had was getting better communication coordination among various
agencies, state and local, that kind of thing. Have we made progress
on that?
>>Frank: Not only have Chuck and -- did Chuck and I listen
to what they had to say about what we call interoperability, which
is the ability to communicate, not only did we listen it to, but
we heard and it we're doing something about that today and I'm
very pleased about that that.
>> Michael: We got some federal funds for that if --
>>Frank: We've applied some federal funds and as a matter
of fact, we are installing equipment in Santa Cruz county as of
this week to give that county interoperability. They will be able
to speak with the police -- the police department can speak with
the county, can speak with the sheriff, they can speak with border
patrol, customs, speak with their Mexican counterparts if need
be on an emergency basis. Because we have very strong mutual aid
agreements with Mexico. Oftentimes it's not uncommon for their
resources to come over to the U.S. and for our resources to go
over to Mexico. That's a very critical area forness terms of communication.
The next step is to finish off the border, do all four counties
along the border and then move north into the rest of Arizona.
So we have some movement on that.
>> Michael: One of the other concerns that popped up earlier
this year was the possibility of a shift to the so-called soft
targets, not the Palo Verdes, maybe not the airports, but the
commercial office buildings, those kinds of things. How real is
that threat, what if anything can you do about it? There's a lot
of those things.
>>Frank: Well, I don't have to define a soft target. I
think you just did. How do you defend against that? Let me say
this, Mike. Here's my view on this. We have people out there that
are acknowledged terrorists, and they've acknowledged that, and
they've told us, and they've demonstrated to us that they hate
us and want to kill us more than they love their own life. How
do you protect against that? I'm not avoiding the question, but
how do you do that?
>> Michael: No, I understand. Let's hope that that's the
extreme and that maybe people by a few, but let's say there's
more that are not quite that extreme that want to make a hit but
they also want to get away. Is that more defensible or not?
>>Frank: Sure, but, again, you cannot defend 100%. We never
will. First of all, there's not enough manpower, not enough money,
not enough resources. And I'm not sure you can ever define every
nook and cranny of vulnerability. I think you have to reach a
point in time where you say, "okay, from a nation, national
point of view, this is the level of risk that we as citizens of
the United States are going to be willing to live with,"
and just deal with it and go on with our lives. At that point
in time you'll have processes and plans in place where you'll
just live that way. For example, today we think nothing of the
screening that we get at the airport. I think nothing of taking
my shoes off. I think nothing of trying to get there earlier.
>> Michael: Two years you asking?
>>Frank: Two years ago, when I was flying to Europe a lot,
I would be upset because -- no, I wouldn't be, I would accept
the fact I had to be there at least two hours early, a dog would
come around and sniff my shoes and everything else he wanted to
and a guy was carrying the machine gun handling the dog and I
just accepted that, and I'd come back here and if I'd get to the
airport more than 30 minutes before flight type I was upset because
I was conditioned. I see that as happening here.
>> Michael: What about the harder targets, what about the
ones that we thought about immediately, Palo Verde, Hoover dam?
There's a lot of others. Are those better protected?
>>Frank: Yes.
>> Michael: Than they were two years you aking?
>>Frank: No question about it. Overall I believe as a nation,
and certainly in Arizona, we are more secure at yellow today than
we were at orange the first time. And, again, a lot of that has
to do with the way we've conditioned ourselves. We had a very
nice lengthy conversation with secretary ridge last week about
this whole -- earlier this week about this whole upcoming event,
and sent out a bunch of information to us which I distributed
to all the appropriate public safety people, first responders,
and I'm going to tell you, our people today do not react to this.
They just act, and you know why? Because there's a plan in place.
They practiced it. So it's not a reactive type thing. It's okay,
it's time for us to do this, here's the plan and the guys do it.
>> Michael: Is that the major advancement we've made, that
we have done contingency planning and thinking we haven't done
before?
>>Frank: It's a big one, sure, but there's others. Number
one, we're standardizing training for first responders. We're
in the process of standardizing equipment. So when the guy, the
fire guy, the EMS guy on the street, has to go to a hospital to
help in an emergency because of some catastrophic event that has
happened, he can be dealing with the same equipment that the hospital
is using and vice versa. If you have a triage in the field, decontamination
units, for example, they need to be standardized, so when guys
use them they know exactly what to do.
>> Michael: Frank Navarrete, thank you for the information.
>>Frank: Quite welcome. It is it was my pleasure.
>> Michael: it is Arizona's professional ballet company
and Palais Arizona is preparing to open its new season. We'll
talk to the ballet's director but first Mike Sauceda tells us
more about the upcoming season.
>> Reporter: Dancers at ballet Arizona, the southwest's
premier professional ballet company, getting ready for their upcoming
season. It starts November 6, which swan lake at symphony hall.
Dancer Alan Rath says it's the first time in years the company
will be accompanied by the Phoenix symphony orchestra and she
says it enhances the dance.
>>Ellen Rath: Because the orchestra and the dancers sort
of feed off each other's energy and it feels like a more live
arts collaboration whereas when you're dancing to record music
it can still be great music but it just doesn't have the energy
that live music does. I think it will make a big difference. It's
really great that we have that this year.
>> Reporter: Rath will play a swan.
>>Ellen: In swan lake I do one of the four little swans,
which is maybe the most famous part of swan lake. Everybody knows
it. It's very in sync, four girls that are hooked arm in arm and
do this little thing together. I'm one of the four little swans
and I also do the MEZERKA in the third act.
>> Reporter: The company will also perform the nut cracker,
valentine's winter, an original piece by ballet Arizona director
Ib Andersen and a BA- LLACINE festival.
>>Ellen: He was a choreographer, the head of New York City
ballet for many years and created hundreds of ballets and his
work is very famous. It's very challenging for dancers. He always
used beautiful classical music, and so it's actually Ib's background.
He danced with New York City background. So Ib has the tie to
it, and we're fortunate to get to do them. There's -- BALLANCINE
trust which allows companies to do or not do the pieces and so
to get the rights to do them is kind of a big deal and for us
to get to do that many of them together in a show is a really
big deal.
>> Reporter: But before the season opens, ballet Arizona
will take their art to 35,000 students Valley-wide, with five
free performants at parks across the Metro area. Some of the kids
will even get to perform with the dancers on stage.
>>Ellen: We go into the schools, and we work with the students
for usually two or three days and we help them sort of choreograph
a little piece, and then they get to perform it on the stage.
I love it. Yeah, I think it's really fun. I love to work with
students like that and, you know, share our art form and it's
also -- helps to build the audience of the future.
>> Michael: Here now to tell us more about the season and
the financial condition of Ballet Arizona is its director Ib Andersen.
Ib, it's good to see you again. You were telling me a couple of
the women dancers there are 6'4"?
>>Ib Andersen: Well, on point. So, no -- I have two girls
that are that height, and I just love them because they're so
beautiful, both of them. So it's very extraordinary to have those
Amazons --
>> Michael: Yeah. And I would think if they don't do well
at ballet they could try out for the NFL.
>>Ib: Possible. Possible.
>> Michael: Ballet doing better financially?
>>Ib: Yes, we just got a challenge grant, the biggest individual
gift ever for Ballet Arizona, of $250,000. So that's something.
But I mean in the arts forum or the arts world of performing arts,
it always is a struggle, you know. But that's how it is. So it's
not nothing unusual. I mean, we're surviving. We're still here.
>> Michael: In fact, you've been thriving the past couple
of years. The ballet came very close to extinction a couple, three
years ago. Any particular things that turned it around -- from
a financial standpoint?
>>Ib: I hope that it just is a reflection of what we do,
that people actually want to come and see it. No, that sort --
that crisis three years ago, that's long over. Now it's just,
you know, day-to-day survival, which is a normal thing for any
company if you're successful or not.
>> Michael: Is this a particularly big week for ticket
sales?
>>Ib: Yeah, we just opened -- we actually had our biggest
single day for single tickets day, so we had a huge sale. So everything
looks positive, and it is an exciting season this year. We're
doing one more program which is five different represent programs,
plus we're having Phoenix symphony plane for swan lake and nutcracker.
They haven't played for nutcracker since '99. So that's really,
I think, what -- I hope would help people to come and see nutcracker.
>> Michael: Absolutely. It's obviously a nice merger of
forums. I hadn't thought about the fact, but I'm sure for the
artists as well, the comment was made, that dancing with the full
orchestra is also an uplifting experience --
>>Ib: Well, it becomes more alive show because you actually
don't really know how they're going to play. So that kind of added
spontaneity gives something different that you can't have with
taped music.
>> Michael: Now, you also have planned an Ib Andersen original.
Tell us more about that.
>>Ib: Yeah, that's not that much to tell, except I started
it -- choreographing it -- it's a full-length piece, not necessarily
about something specific, like a story thing. I've done 15 minutes
so far. What is it about? Don't know. Have a clue. Sort of it's
taking shape. It's like you -- the clay is the dancers, and you
choose certain music, and how I do is I have sort of an idea about
it, but it's vague, and it takes shape, you know. So it's -- to
me it's very exciting.
>> Michael: How much of that, when you're putting together
-- how much of that can you do up here and how much do you really
have to do where you say I want to really see the dancers doing
this? Is it a combination of the two?
>>Ib: I mean, I never prepare steps before going to the
studio. I really work on the dancers because that's the way I
do it. I'm not sitting at a desk. But -- but the idea and the
concept of things are there before I go in.
>> Michael: Now --
>>Ib: So that's a huge amount of preparation before I actually
start.
>> Michael: And the Ballet Arizona also is doing some things
for students? We mentioned. Those are -- out in the open, I understand?
>>Ib: Students?
>> Michael: The shows that you're taking on the road, I
think there's five of them or so?
>>Ib: We're doing under the stars. This is here in the
beginning of October. We're performing in five different parks
for free and it's sort of like an hour and 20 minutes of excerpts
of the ballets we're going to do throughout the season. So it's
something to see.
>> Michael: All right. Ib Andersen, thank you very much.
Best of luck on the season.
>>Ib: Thank you.
>> Michael: You can find out more about Ballet Arizona
by visiting the Channel 8 website. You can find that at www.kaet.asu.edu.
When you get there, position the pointer over the word "Horizon"
and click on that, and that will lead you to a link to Ballet
Arizona, while you're there you can also check out a transcript
of tonight's show, find out more about upcoming shows, and speaking
of that, here is what is coming up tomorrow on "Horizon."
>>Reporter: Phoenix elects a new Mayor and one city council
race goes down to the wire. California gives the green light to
illegal immigrants getting driver's licenses. What does Arizona's
governor think of it? And a Corporation Commissioner may quit
before impeachment proceedings begin. These stories on "Horizon"'s
Journalists Roundtable Friday at 7:00.
>> Michael: Thanks very much for joining us on this Thursday
evening. I'm Michael Grant. Have a great one. Good night.
Back to the top